Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(app(compose, f), g), x) → app(f, app(g, x))

Q is empty.


QTRS
  ↳ DirectTerminationProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app(app(app(compose, f), g), x) → app(f, app(g, x))

Q is empty.

We use [23] with the following order to prove termination.

Recursive path order with status [2].
Precedence:
compose > app2

Status:
compose: multiset
app2: [1,2]